Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Wk2 Reading Activity 7 - ADL/Standards/SCORM

What do you get when the government, industry, and academia collaborate to provide education and training worldwide in the most interactive, cost effective, and individualized way you can imagine? You get the ADL (Advanced Distributed Learning) Initiative! This is a plan to connect learning management systems by creating tools and content based on standards that allows for use on multiple LMS platforms. You can check out their website here.

The ADL website describes the content to "standardize and modernize the delivery of training and education" as SCORM.  SCORM stands for shareable content object reference model, which was developed by the ADL Initiative team.  The website also outlines the requirements for SCORM:  interoperability, accessibility, reusability, durability, maintainability, and adaptability.  SCORM has to be able to work on many different learning management systems and be based on guidelines, specifications, and standards. SCORM is made up of metadata, which specifies language and level of difficulty, contains content objects, and allows for searches within the content.

All in all, the ADL is working hard to make online learning more accessible and easy-to-use. They created SCORM so that content can be standards-based and the best that it can be!  Although I read some great things about SCORM, I also found that like any program, there are some bugs to be worked out. I truly think this is only the beginning of the ADL Initiative, and as changes are made and more ideas are sorted out - some amazing technology is going to prevail!  Downes (2000) notes that the "ADL worked closely with another important online learning initiative, the Instructional Management Systems Project in the development of a standard for learning objects (a learning object is a self-contained package of educational material)."  The more ADL works with others in improving the content, the more exciting online education becomes!

References

Downes, S.  (2000).  Advanced distributed learning network.  The Technology Source.  Retrieved from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=1034



*Image obtained from microsoft.com

Friday, July 9, 2010

WK1 Project - LMO Overview

Copyright-free photo obtained from microsoft.org

Ever since I started this class, entitled Learning Management Systems and Organization, there have been acronyms being thrown at me that have become all scrambled in my head. Let's try to untangle these letters and straighten out the definitions of each of these acronyms:  CMS, LMS, LCMS, and PLE.

The acronym CMS stands for course management systems in the education field.  A course management system is an online platform that manages a student's classes.  A school system usually contains the foundation for the system, and students are asked to register with the system during the enrollment process.  At this point, each student has their own organizational space on the system where all assignments are posted, grades are kept track of, and progress is monitored.  These systems were widely avaliable to students in 1997, and since then the popularity and use have increased significantly (Rabinowitz & Ullman, 2004).  Some common CMS's used today are Blackboard, eCollege, and WebCT.  The benefits of CMS's are better handling of grades, easy registration, library resources, and organization.

The next acronym we need to unscramble is LMS.  This acronym stands for learning (or learner) management system and is used more commercially than CMS's.  An LMS manages learners based on individual requirements, and is perfect for the workforce.  This system is not broken into semesters or terms, but can be used at any time with any type of job. "Typically an LMS provides the means to track users, assess performance, deploy content, and access general administrative functions such as management of users records  (Adobe TechNote).

Although it looks quite similar, an LCMS is something completely different from an LMS.   We just learned that LMS stands for learning management system - now we will discuss LCMS, or learning content management systems. LCMS's are on the cutting edge of technology and are intended for use in big systems.  They are currently being used in the army, because training and readiness are major components of the system. The LCMS's are used to prepare and train individuals for situations they will encounter.  "LCM's evolved out of the recognition in some companies that they had a big problem with lots and lots of learning content, and no coherent way of managing it, finding it, maintaining it, and tracking usage of it" (Wilson, 2003).

The last acronym to unscramble is PLE.  PLE stands for personal learning environment and is being defined as we speak. A personal learning environment can be a lot of different things, but basically any type of system used to learn that can be organized around a certain person.  Places like social networks and virtual worlds are labeled as PLEs.  There are still many questions surrounding PLEs, but as our technology advances, our understanding of PLEs will also advance. I found a great video describing PLEs at Slideshare.net Make sure you check it out to learn even more about PLEs!

References

Adobe TechNote  (November 2004). What is a learning management system?  Retrieved from    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/187/tn_18773.html

Attwell, G.  (2006).  Personal learning environments [Video file].   Retrieved from    http://www.slideshare.net/GrahamAttwell/personal-learning-environments-46423

Rabinowitz, M. & Ullman, C.  (October 2004).  Course management systems and the reinvention of instruction. The journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/2004/10/01/course-management-systems-and-the-reinvention-of-instruction.aspx?sc_lang=en

Wilson, D.  (March 2003).  Do I need an LCMS? Elearnity.  Retrieved from http://www.elearnity.com/EKCLoad.htm?load=categorylist?openForm&Target=LCMS




Thursday, July 1, 2010

Wk1 Comment - Joe Huber's Activity 1



One of the more astounding and surprising aspects of course management systems (CMS) is that most anyone who is associated with them, or have used them, are not about to answer whether or not they work at keeping students engaged, or if they are an accurate measure of mastery (Carmean & Brown, 2005).   Faculty members embrace them for use in their classes because higher education students embrace the new modes of learning, so little effort is extended to determine their success.
According to Carmean and Brown (2005), the individuals that claim that CMS is a success are doing so based on the notion that any of inclusion of technology is beneficial, but more often than not “[w]hat is missing is assessment “(p. 3).   McGee, Carmean, and Jafari (2005) posit that students and faculty alike began to use the CMS with the unexpected result of it becoming a learning management tool. This led to some difficulty with the functionality of the CMS, which in turn caused some frustration. Those individuals that were closely involved, and consequently directly impacted by this frustration began to voice the changes that they wished to see occur in CMS. McGee, Carmean, and Jafari documented their desires.  Participants wished to see the CMS become more social, involving more feedback and interaction, they wished them to become more engaging to accommodate all learner preferences, and students had to be able to take some ownership of their learning.  In investigating these aspects, it became apparent that the end users must become directly involved in the design process. 
This raised other issues, and as McGee, Carmean, and Jafari mentioned, administration must find a way to balance the economic realities of the situation. As Walker (2010), points out, the Great Recession has left its impact on schools who will now be hard pressed to stay within budget.   School systems now faced with diminishing budgets must look at ways to implement CMS in an open-source environment, taking advantage of applications that they can use for free.  Sources such as Moodle are becoming the norm in areas where schools were not able to afford Blackboard.  Open source systems such as Moodle and Google apps make it easier for both the students and the teachers to access what would otherwise be expensive and unaffordable programs. 
What all the experts agree upon is that the development of the CMS is an evolutionary process that does not remain static.  If the CMS is to continue to succeed, it will require the input of all involved in its use. 



@Joe -

I love the fact that the learner has been a part of the design process for CMS's - it seems only fitting!  We know what needs to be improved because we experience these difficulties firsthand!  The way CMS's have improved over the years has been such a direct blessing to us, because we would not be having such a wonderful experience at Full Sail University if this evolution hadn't happened!
THURSDAY, JULY 1, 2010 - 10:23 PM

Wk1 Comment: Kathy Kellen's Activity 4



In her article “What Is An Academic Paper?” Karen Gocsik (2004) addresses how writing in college differs from that in high school. She clearly defines “academic writing” as writing that is done by scholars for other scholars, such that addresses topics that the academic community is interested in, and presents the reader with an informed argument. Writers of the NACTA Journal article “Teaching Tips/Notes” explain that 
      Using the professional/ technical style would demonstrate that
      the student not only has studied and understands the material   
      well but also has organized his/or her thoughts using the 
      professional style common for that field of study and has 
      therefore moved to a higher level of organization.  (2010).

Moving from personal response to analytical writing can present a challenge. An academic writer must show that the associations, reactions, and how the text has been experienced, are written with an analytical frame of reference instead of a personal one. Points to remember are to summarize, evaluate, analyze, and synthesize. “When you analyze, you break the text into its parts. When you synthesize, you look for connections between ideas.” (Gocsik, 2004 p.18)
In depth research is necessary for both the development of arguments and the creation of an original piece of writing. This will avoid repetitive content and clichés. The use of secondary sources supports conclusions. (Przybyla, 2009 p.4). 

Questions are a vital component to the academic writer. Gocsik’s article lists questions to be asked at every stage of the writing process, which can help the writer to focus in on the topic, the target audience, and the appropriate structure. It also lists helpful tips for writers either new to, or long distanced from academic writing. 

@Kathy -
We must have been on the same wave-length today, because after I wrote my blog post I went to check yours and we wrote about the same article!  Moving from personal response writing to analytical writing was such a huge challenge for me, so reading the article and your blog post helped me think about the differences and how I can improve my writing!  After you mentioned all the questions in this article being vital to the writing process, I think I will go back and review them! Thanks!
Thursday, July 1, 2010 - 09:14 PM

Wk1 Reading: Activity 2-Process and Purpose

One aspect of online learning that has been a difficult transition for me is academic writing. I chose to do a blog post about the process and purpose of academic writing because it is something that challenges and intrigues me. There are some major differences between the writing taught in high school and the writing expected at the college-level. Gocsik (2005) defines academic writing as "moving beyond what you know about a topic and beginning to consider what you think." A few ways in which academic writing is different from all other types of writing is that it is writing done by a scholar for scholars and the academic community. Instead of being personal, it leans more toward analytical.  When I write it is very hard for me to not include my personal opinions. I think this was the hardest transition for me when I began writing on an academic level. The Dartmouth Writing Program (Gocsik, 2005) suggests picking an audience, taking a stance, and being confident in what you are writing. Topics need to be provocative, startling, controversial, or fresh! If you aren't interested in what you are writing; no one else will be interested enough to read it!

No wonder I'm struggling with academic writing - in the article "Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions , Know-How, and Academic Identity, the authors outline some of the challenges of writing as being self-doubt, creating ideas, doubt of relevance, lack of skills, and fear of critique (Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J., 2009)! That is only a few of the examples of why it is hard for people to start writing! I know that I struggle with most of these challenges.  These authors also note that "developing an identity and voice as an academic writer results from the process of coming to terms with writing emotions and developing procedural and technical writing know-how."

Often students are thrown into academic situations where they have to write scholarly papers, and are never formerly taught the proper format.  More focus needs to be placed on instruction of academic writing and research.  One group of people are developing an idea that could change the way academic writing is taught - it is called writing consultations (Murray, R., Thow, M., Moore, S., & Murphy, M., 2008).  A writing consultation takes place between two academic writers placed together to help improve writing practices.  The partners will take turns being the writer or the consultant. The consultant leads the writer through six steps while filling out a template to keep notes.  After filling out the template, they switch places and work on the other person's writing. The process is meant to change writing behavior.  I think this is a wonderful idea, because it is always easier to bounce ideas off of someone else and share different expertise. I hope that more online learning environments think about using this process when students are presented with big academic writing assignments. I would not have felt so overwhelmed and alone during the writing process if I could have been paired up with another classmate to do a writing consultation!



Sources

Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J.  (2009).  Demystifying academic writing:  Reflections on                        emotions, know-how, and academic identity.  Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269-284.  doi:  10.1080/03098260902734943

Gocsik, K.  (2005).  Dartmouth Writing Program.  Retrieved from www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/ac_paper/what.shtml

Murray, R., Thow, M., Moore, S., & Murphy, M.  (2008).  The writing consultation:  Developing academic writing practices.  Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(2), 119-128.  doi:  10.1080/03098770701851854